Twitter icon
Facebook icon
YouTube icon
Instagram Icon

Congresswoman Ann McLane Kuster

Representing the 2nd District of New Hampshire

Congresswoman recounts 'heartbreaking' trip to US-Mexico border

Jun 27, 2018
In The News

Days after returning from a trip to the U.S.-Mexico border in Texas, U.S. Rep. Ann M. Kuster, D-N.H., described what she called an emotionally distressing scene of parents and children torn apart by immigration officials.

“It’s just heartbreaking,” Kuster said via phone Tuesday. “They have no idea when they will ever see their children again. Their biggest fear is that they will be deported without them.”

Kuster represents New Hampshire’s 2nd congressional district, which includes all of the Monadnock Region. Over the weekend, she joined a 27-member Democratic congressional delegation that toured three immigration facilities in Texas.

According to Kuster, the delegation was invited to the region by U.S. Reps. Vicente Gonzalez and Filemon Vela, both Texas Democrats, whose districts include the border cities of McAllen and Brownsville, respectively.

Many of the lawmakers who traveled to the Lone Star State are part of a House caucus called the Democratic Working Women’s Group, Kuster said, describing members as mothers and grandmothers. She said she and other Democrats have a duty to bear witness to the situation unfolding on the border.

In recent weeks, more than 2,300 children have been separated from their families under the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy.

The policy, which calls for the prosecution of all individuals who illegally enter the country, was announced by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions in early April.

Under the policy, any child traveling with a parent referred for prosecution has been placed in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The practice of separating children from their parents sparked an outcry from Democrats and many Republicans, including former First Lady Laura Bush, who called the practice cruel and immoral.

But supporters of the “zero tolerance” policy say undocumented immigrants are putting themselves in this situation by bringing their kids to the border in the first place. Sessions has argued the measure is a necessary corrective to what he perceives as lax immigration policies under the Barack Obama administration.

Last week, President Donald Trump made a sudden reversal, signing an executive order to end the separation of families and instead detain parents and children together for an indefinite period of time.

The executive order has resulted in significant confusion over how the more than 2,000 children who have already been separated from their parents will be reunited with them. Moreover, the order does not specify where families will be detained.

As an added complication, a 1997 consent decree known as the Flores settlement stipulates that unaccompanied minors can be held for only a short time before they must be released to a parent, legal guardian or other relative.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in a news release Saturday that there is a coordinated process in place to reunite families and that the government knows the location of all the kids in its custody.

According to the release, more than 500 unaccompanied minors who were separated from their parents as a result of the “zero tolerance” policy have already been reunited with their families.

Kuster said she saw little evidence of those reunification efforts on Saturday’s tour.

Describing a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Port Isabel, Texas, near Brownsville, Kuster said she and other lawmakers met with about 40 mothers who had been separated from their children.

According to Kuster, many of the mothers were from Honduras and spoke tearfully about the separation, as well as the violence they were fleeing. One of those women had been at the facility since May 25, Kuster said.

“It had been a month since she last saw her four children,” Kuster said. “She had no idea where they were.”

The delegation also visited a Customs and Border Protection processing facility in McAllen, which Kuster described as a large, prison-like warehouse with tall, chain-link fencing dividing people by age and sex.

She said many of the younger children were shivering and huddled beneath silver, Mylar blankets, unaccustomed to the air conditioning and trying to find relief from the bright, overhead lights.

Kuster said the Customs and Border Patrol staff that she and her colleagues spoke with were trying to be compassionate but found themselves in an impossible situation.

“When we asked about reunification, they said they need further guidance,” she said. “They did not have any direction as to how to go about reunification.”

Kuster, who is running for re-election, said she has received close to 1,000 calls, letters and emails from her constituents about the crisis on the border.

“People in New Hampshire are very distressed about this,” Kuster said. “I’ve received many phone calls from people calling in tears.”

Kevin K. McAleenan, commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, announced Monday that his agency has temporarily stopped handing over adults who illegally cross the border with their children for prosecution, effectively reviving a “catch and release” policy that was pursued under the Obama administration.

Because of a lack of detention facilities, McAleenan told reporters, many families will be released with a promise that they return for a court hearing. He noted that his agency will continue to refer single adults for prosecution as required under the “zero tolerance” policy.

As House members consider a number of immigration proposals, Kuster insisted that any legislation must explicitly prohibit the separation of families and require the reunification of families that have already been split.

“I support strong borders,” she said. “I’m not suggesting we open the border to everyone. But we need a process that is fair and humane.”

According to Kuster, there are alternatives to family detention that have worked well in the past. She mentioned the Family Case Management Program, which was launched by the Department of Homeland Security in 2015.

Instead of holding parents and children in detention centers, families in the program were released and monitored by social workers tasked with making sure they attended their court hearings.

“This program was audited,” Kuster said. “It was 99-100 percent successful in terms of parents showing up for their asylum hearing.”

The Trump administration canceled the policy last year in what it called a cost-cutting measure.

Kuster also mentioned ankle bracelets and other forms of electronic monitoring as effective alternatives to detention.

“We will be working with our colleagues to try to resurrect a bipartisan approach on immigration,” she said. “This is a serious human rights violation that’s happening on our watch.”